Thursday, October 22, 2009

Blame The Ump. And Keep It That Way.

I was over at Tito Jackson's house watching the Twins-Yankees playoff game when the umpire pictured above, Phil Cuzzi, blew this call. Joe Mauer hit a ball that not only glanced off the Yankees left fielder in fair territory, it bounced in fair territory and left an indentation before bouncing into the stands. Cuzzi, amazingly, called the ball foul. Now look, even I have to admit that the way the Twins were driving in runners that night (they weren't), they probably would have found a way NOT to drive in Mauer even if he was correctly awarded a double. Even though this call nearly killed me, I am over it.

The incompetence in umpiring that I have witnessed in subsequent Major League Baseball baseball games, however, has bordered on criminal. Two mind-blowingly horrible calls occurred in the same inning of the Yankees-Angels game the other night, and both involved the Yankees smug right-fielder Nick Swisher.

The first blown called occurred with Swisher on second. The pitcher tried to pick him off and, as can be seen from the image above, had him out by a foot. The call by umpire Dale Scott? SAFE! Check out how close Scott is on this call - he's three feet away! Now, Swisher eventually made it to third, and tried to tag up and score on a fly to center fielder Torii Hunter. After Hunter caught the ball, Swisher scored easily but was then ruled out by the third base umpire Tim McClelland for "leaving third base too early." Replays not only showed that Swisher DID NOT leave early (before Hunter caught the ball), they showed that McClelland was clearly watching Hunter only. He did not have his eyes on Swisher at all. Basically, a bogus make-up call. There have been other instances that I won't go into here, but there is a good Deadspin piece on the issue if you care to read it.

All of this incompetence has led to calls for instant replay in Major League Baseball. Today, MLB only uses replay to determine if home runs were fair or foul or truly cleared the fence. As I sure you know, football and hockey use instant replay to certain degrees today. With all of this umpire incompetence in baseball today, wouldn't it make sense to implement instant replay to solve these problems?

No. And here are a few reasons why:

1. Can you imagine how long baseball games would be today if there was a delay every time one of these clowns made a bad call, and they had to contact some guy up in the booth to watch the replay? Six hours long. It would be unbearable.

2. Baseball, more than any other sport, contains the "human element" of calling balls and strikes and runners "safe or out." The outcome of the game is determined by human thought, not video proof. There is something "robotic" of turning to the replay booth every time a call is disputed. I enjoy baseball largely because of this "human element" which I find charming. Sometimes charmingly good, sometimes charmingly bad. These calls, however, give fans something to discuss, debate and bitch about. This is the essence of baseball and sports in general. There are going to be some bad calls that go your team's way and some that don't. Live with it, and find a way to overcome.

3. Sometimes, even the replay booth doesn't get it right. See: NFL.

I do feel that baseball umpires should be held accountable for their performance, just like players, managers and general managers. When their performance is this bad, there must be repercussions, not just the post-game admittance that "Geez, I blew that call. Again." No umpire is going to be perfect, but the bad calls are becoming a trend. If the long-term umpires cannot handle the speed of the game, find someone who can - just like they do with players.

Instant replay in baseball would not solve the umpire issue, and would detract from the game.

Jeff

8 comments:

tony8489 said...

christ dude, lay off the yankees. nick swisher gives a lot of money to charity. you are way, way off base on this one. while I agree with some of your arguments, the failure to properly implement instant reply is, at some point, going to cost someone a world championship. then, is the mythical "human element" charming? 6 year old girls selling me girl scout cookies are charming. this is not "charming". this is stupid. can you honestly tell me that if that blown mauer call cost the twins a championship, you would brush it off and call it "charming"? no way. It won't be so funny if it happens to your ball club, and not just the hated yankees.

Jeff said...

It has happened to my ballclub. A couple weeks back. Who knows - it might have cost them a championship.

You know, we could take this a step further and video cameras could be installed in center field with some sort of laser-field strike zone and balls and stikes could be called with that technology.

And then, a sensor could be installed in each base and players gloves to determine if the ball reached the glove first or the player touched the base first. If, for some reason, the sensors don't work, instant replay could be used.

This isn't so far off - check this out:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574469381382610114.html

Freealonzo said...

What just kills me is that these umps were in perfect position to see and make the call. It isn't like football where there are bodies and intertangled and you have to figure out where the ball is when a knee hits the wall.

Look at Cuzzi on that Mauer double. That would be textbook on how an umpire should position himself to make a call on a ball down the line. How in God's name did he blow it?

tony8489 said...

thomps, when I am talking about costing a championship, I literally mean a blown call, like the mauer play, that sends in the winning run for the championship. I know you very well, and I know you would be the first one to jock for instant reply if it happened to the twins and someday it is gonna happen. to someone.do it, and do it tomorrow. use what we have now, with the HD technology, and then start tweaking it. free, no way to explain it. no way at all.

Jeff said...

tony - there is no question that if the Twins lost a championship on a bad call, it would scar me for the rest of my life. That is a very extreme example, however. I just think that bringing replay to baseball would be detrimental to the game.

I got a chance to listen to some of Joe Soucheray's show this afternoon and this was the main topic of discussion. He is dead set against replay for many of the same reasons I am.

He also brought up some odd scenarios on how the game could change if replay is institured. Here is one:

Guy on second, two outs. The batter hits a fly to center and the runner takes off as soon as the ball is hit because there are two out. He would easily score. The ball looks like it is caught by the outfielder and ruled an out by the umpire. However, upon the instant replay review, it is ruled a "trap" and the batter is awarded a single.

What happens to the runner? Third base? Is is allowed to score because he would have easily under normal circumstances?

There would have to quite a few of these "judgement rulings" that would actually change the game of baseball.

Jeff said...

Here's another one. Let's say the horrible call on Mauer's "foul" was with bases loaded. As soon as "foul" is called, all runners stop running. Upon review, the ball is ruled "fair."

Single? Double? Triple? Who scores? Too many intangibles.

It would change the game.

dsve m said...

Mauer got to third in that at bat with NO outs and didn't score. The Twins did not get screwed on that.

Jeff said...

Dave - I agree. They had the bases loaded with nobody out. No excuses not to score there.